Thank you, Margaret.  I wondered why those lists starting showing up in 
the Corps mailings.
Margaret Janes wrote:
> Hi Regina - Once we get through the oral arguments in the 4th circuit it
> will be several months to the decision - perhaps early 2009.  Until that
> time WVDEP will issued SMCRA and NPDES permits - Chambers decision will have
> no direct influence on that.  In order to start mining, however, companies
> generally will need to build sediment ponds first and they can't do that
> without a 404 permit.  At this point because a few months ago Judge Chambers
> ordered the Corps to notify us immediately if they issue permits - we know
> what is issued pretty much in real time.  You may also have noticed that the
> Corps is now issuing weekly notices on what individual permits they are
> issuing (after violating regulations on notification for many years).  So if
> the Corps issues permits between now and the decision we could add them to
> the Chambers case.  There are now 14 mines involved in the case in one way
> or the other.  Margaret
>
>
>
>
>   
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Regina Hendrix [mailto:regina1936@verizon.net] 
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:22 PM
> To: Margaret Janes
> Cc: All of FOM list; ec(a)osenergy.org
> Subject: USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU
>
> Margaret, I just got the Corps' notice on a project at the Muddlety 
> Surface Mine No. 1, pending permit number S-3004-07, in Nicholas County 
> on Muddlety Creek, a tributary of the Gauley.  They also reference the 
> NPDES Permit WV1022229.  Every time I get one of these notices I'm 
> traumatized.
>
> I've added the FOM list and Sierra Club's energy committee as cc's 
> because I'm probably not the only one who'd like an update on our case 
> in the 4th Circuit. 
>
> Also, I'm hoping you will give us a short update on where this project 
> on the Gauley stands, i.e., is this project on hold until we get a 
> decision in the 4th Circuit?  (They mention proposed Valley Fills 1 and 
> 2.)  In this instance would the NPDES permit be on hold also?
>
> Thanks, once again, for sharing your knowledge of these proposed and 
> accomplished criminal acts.
>
> Regina Hendrix
>
>
>
>
>
>